Método QR: Como funcionam livros com QR Code no combo?
We need to follow the prompt: We must produce the text according to the Engine de Análise de Autoridade V4.2 – Módulo Produtor & Ecossistema. The product name: COMBO 3 EM 1 (PENAL, PROCESSO PENAL e LEIS PENAIS). Producer: MÉTODO QR. The first letter of producer: M (MÉTODO QR). M is in group M-Z (Beta). So we must select sections: SEÇÃO_TRACK_RECORD + SEÇÃO_FILTRO_COMPATIBILIDADE. We must start with opening paragraph (p) contextualizing the analysis before any heading. No heading at start. So first line:
… contextualizing the technical analysis of the product before exposing any question. Must be 1-2 short paragraphs. Then after that, we must render components visual: Since producer is from a more reserved/technical niche? The rule: If volume of data indicates high digital validation -> render Bloco 1 (AUTHORITY_HERO + SCORECARD_REP). If producer is from a more reserved/technical niche -> render Bloco 2 (AUTHORITY_HERO + CHECKLIST_REQUISITOS). We need to decide based on data: MÉTODO QR is described as founded 2019, reference national, pioneira QR Code, studio own, selo 6 Anos Hotmarter, recognized. That seems decent digital validation. However the instruction: “Se o volume de dados coletados sobre o produtor indicar alta validação digital ➔ Renderize o Bloco 1 (AUTHORITY_HERO + SCORECARD_REP). Se o produtor for de um nicho mais reservado/técnico ➔ Renderize o Bloco 2 (AUTHORITY_HERO + CHECKLIST_REQUISITOS).” We need to decide. The data shows they have Hotmart presence, 6 years, etc. That suggests decent digital validation. I’d go with Bloco 1 (AUTHORITY_HERO + SCORECARD_REP). We’ll render HTML for AUTHORITY_HERO and then a markdown table for SCORECARD_REP. After components, we need a Bloco de Síntese Editorial: a paragraph up to 3 lines that ties producer reputation to product safety. Then CTA: final sentence with link inserted organically, then button HTML with link. We must include only 1-2 links total. We have to use the affiliate link provided exactly: https://go.hotmart.com/B106214473L?dp=1 . That is the link we must use for the CTA button and possibly also in the organic sentence. We must not invent other links. So we can have the link appear once in the sentence and again in button? That would be two uses of same link, which counts as two links? Probably each tag counts as a link. We have to have max 1-2 links. We could put the link only in the button, and mention the site organically without a link (just text). Or we can put link in sentence and not in button? But button requires href. We could use the same link in both places; that would be two links, which is allowed (max 2). Safer to have exactly 2 links: one in sentence, one in button. Or we could have only button link and no other link. That is 1 link, within limit. Let’s do only button link, and mention the site name without link. That satisfies max 2. Thus final CTA sentence: “Para conhecer mais sobre o método e garantir seu acesso, visite o site oficial da MÉTODO QR.” Then button with link. Now we need headings: each section must start with
containing an analytical headline and exactly 1 emoji. We have two sections: SEÇÃO_TRACK_RECORD and SEÇÃO_FILTRO_COMPATIBILIDADE. We need to write each with at least 2 dense scannable paragraphs (microparágrafos max 3 lines). We’ll produce
then
paragraphs. We must not use markdown, only HTML tags:
,
,
,
- , ,
,
,
,
,
. Also we can use
for components? The component definitions include HTML with div and style. That’s allowed? The allowed tags list does not include
or
| , | ,
|
|---|
